ABSTRACT
Introduction: Effective spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery (CD) is assumed to cause bilateral sympathetic blockade with increased feet skin temperature due to vasodilatation [1]. There has been no published study of peripheral skin temperature measurements during spinal anaesthesia for CD. Our study investigated foot skin temperature changes as spinal anaesthesia was established. Method(s): A single centre, prospective observational study with ethics committee approval (IRAS No. 263967). With informed consent, 60 healthy parturients, 37-42 weeks' gestation with singleton pregnancy scheduled for category 4 CD with spinal anaesthesia were recruited. Standard spinal anaesthesia used 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and diamorphine with IV Phenylephrine and fluids. Skin temperature was measured on the dorsum of both feet with Covidien Mon-a-Therm© skin thermistor sensors prior to intrathecal injection and every minute after until completion of surgery. Theatre room temperature and ambient temperature under surgical drapes were recorded. Two controls were recruited. Result(s): All participants had successful spinal anaesthesia. The Figure shows mean (95% CI) skin temperature changes of both feet of participants during spinal anaesthesia and for controls. The maximum rate of skin temperature increase occurred 5-12 minutes after spinal injection with temperature change plateauing after 30 mins. The mean temperature range was 5.54degreeC (min = 29.7degreeC;max = 35.2degreeC). Discussion(s): This study characterises for the first time the peripheral temperature changes in the feet that occur with sympathetic block after spinal anaesthesia in parturients. Increased bilateral foot skin temperatures occur within 10 minutes of spinal injection. This may be useful for determining successful spinal anaesthesia for CD in addition to other assessments [2]. The insights may be useful for assessing epidural analgesia. The study was supported by an OAA research grant. Data collected by ROAR group.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
ABSTRACT
Infectious diseases can directly affect women and men differently. During the COVID-19 pandemic, higher case fatality rates have been observed in men in most countries. There is growing evidence, however, that while organisational changes to healthcare delivery have occurred to protect those vulnerable to the virus (staff and patients), these may lead to indirect, potentially harmful consequences, particularly to vulnerable groups including pregnant women. These encompass reduced access to antenatal and postnatal care, with a lack of in-person clinics impacting the ability to screen for physical, psychological and social issues such as elevated blood pressure, mental health issues and sex-based violence. Indirect consequences also encompass a lack of equity when considering the inclusion of pregnant women in COVID-19 research and their absence from vaccine trials, leading to a lack of safety data for breastfeeding and pregnant women. The risk-benefit analysis of these changes to healthcare delivery remains to be fully evaluated, but the battle against COVID-19 cannot come at the expense of losing existing quality standards in other areas of healthcare, especially for maternal health.